KORACH
by Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum
Torah Reading (in
I Samuel 11:14-12:22
* * *
KORACH'S ENVY
In the account of the sin of the
Ten Spies in the previous parshah of SHELACH LECHA, we learned about the
painful consequences of distorted vision in man's relation with G-d. The Spies
and those who listened to them lacked faith in G-d's promise to take them to
the
The distortion of vision
that is the theme of our present parshah of KORACH, a distortion which led to
such dire consequences for Korach and those who listened to him, was of a
different nature. In Korach's case, the distortion lay
in the way man views his fellow man: Korach could not bear to see another more
prominent than himself. "Why is Moses the king, Aaron the high priest. and Korach just another
Levite?"
The sin of vision of the
spies is deeply rooted in the sin of eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.
Just as the outer appearance of the fruit made Eve lose faith in what G-d said
about not eating it, so too the spies wanted to see things for themselves and
make their own decisions -- and they lost their faith. Korach's sin of vision,
on the other hand, is rooted in Cain's jealousy of Abel, whose offering (the
According to the Midrash,
Korach's "starting point" is to be found at the end of the previous
parshah, giving the commandment of Tzitzis, where a
single blue thread is tied with seven white threads as fringes on the four
corners of our garments. [Issues relating to the use of white linen threads
with the blue TECHEILES woolen thread are also bound up with Cain and Abel: the
offering of the former was of linen, while the latter offered sheep.] The
question that Korach asked was: "If a person is wearing a garment that is
entirely TECHEILES, does it also require Tzitzis?"
When Moses answered that it does, Korach ridiculed him: "If a single blue
thread is enough to fulfill the duty of Tzitzis for a
white garment, surely a garment that is entirely TECHEILES doesn't need Tzitzis!"
Korach wanted a garment
that was all TECHEILES, all kingship and grandeur. He did not want to be
reminded that the only King is G-d, all around us, in all directions. Korach
wanted the kingship and grandeur for himself: he was all TECHEILES, all
GEVURAH. According to rabbinic tradition, Korach possessed amazing wealth.
Everything was for himself, yet in rebelling against Moses and Aaron, Korach
played the democrat, the people's champion: "All the community, all of
them are holy, and HASHEM is within them, and why do you lord it over the
Assembly of HASHEM?"
Korach's rebellion was
against the authority of Moses (the rule of law), but he justified it with an
appeal to people's highest ideals: "Everyone is
holy -- so why do we need priests and rabbis?" Korach used his wealth and
prestige to whip everyone up into a frenzy against
Moses.
The
first word of G-d's command to Moses and Aaron -- "SEPARATE yourselves from
this assembly and I will consume them." (Numbers 16:21) gave its name to
a doctrine that was espoused by Rabbi Moses, the Chasam
Sofer (1762-1839) leader of European Jewry in his
time, in response to the proponents of religious and cultural assimilation. The
doctrine is that of HISBADLUS, Separation. At a time when assimilationist
thinking was spreading rapidly among the Jews of Europe, the Chasam Sofer urged his faithful
co-religionists to separate themselves in every possible way from anyone who
deviated from the Judaism of the Shulchan Aruch, the Code of Torah law.
Today, assimilation has
become so universal that the Torah faithful have little option but to run after
the assimilated and try to help them find their way back to G-d. Nevertheless,
having an understanding of the origins of HISBADLUS may help us in trying to
unravel the knots of MACHLOKET (conflict) in which our communities are so tied
up. For HISBADLUS remains the key to the separatist attitudes shown by some in
the observant community until today. The essence of HISBADLUS is to try to
distance oneself from those who represent a culture
and way of life that are in rebellion against G-d's Torah as we have it from
Moses.
The assimilation movement
made rapid inroads among Jews everywhere from the 1800's onwards because of the
strength of its appeal to those who felt caged in by the centuries-old
restrictions on Jewish social and economic life. While assimilation had its
theorists and exponents (from Moses Mendelson
onwards), what gave it such power and influence was the fact that it was
sponsored by a clique of extremely wealthy Jewish sponsors (= Korach) who were
themselves in flight from the Torah of Moses. They used their influence in the
countries in which they lived to establish synagogues, educational and cultural
institutions that deviated from the traditional pathway. Indeed, they have been
so effective that they have succeeded in making what is essentially a deviation
appear mainstream, whereas the authentic Torah of Moses appears purely
marginal. What could be more of a distortion of vision?
* * *
HELL
The punishment of Korach
and his band was that "they went down alive to SHE-OL" (Numbers
16:30). The bible commentator OR HACHAYIM (Rabbi Chayim ben Attar) explains (ad
loc.) the use of the word SHE-OL (which has the connotation of
"borrow") as a term for Hell. "The explanation is that the earth
did not have power over them to kill them, but they were left alive, and the
earth gave them as a deposit to Gehennom".
Many seekers of the truth
of the Torah are confused about what place She-ol, Gehennom or Hell really play in the Torah worldview. In the
Bible, the word used for hell is, as in our parshah, SHE-OL (see also Genesis
42:38 and Deuteronomy 32:22).
Throughout the Talmud,
the standard term referring to hell is Gehennom, but
this does not appear in the Bible at all except as the name of a location just
outside ancient
The confusion over what
hell really is derives precisely from the fact that all false religions and
cults use precisely this idea to strike such fear into the hearts of their led
flocks that they will be psychologically locked into the cult all their lives.
Going down to hell alive is precisely what is so frightening about the idea, as
it means that death is not a refuge of unconsciousness from the threatened
pains of hell. On the contrary, "hellfire and brimstone" preachers
delight in reminding their audiences how, despite the excruciating pain of the
threatened fire and freezing cold, etc., there is no death and no relief in
hell, only more and more pain. all this as the punishment of those who dare
stray from the cult!
In the Five Books of
Moses, the prime sanction that is threatened for disobedience against the Torah
is not hell, but rather the tribulations of This World (as in the curses in
Leviticus chapter 26 and in Deuteronomy chapter 28). However, Hell is also
threatened: "For a fire is kindled through my wrath and it will burn to
the depths of SHE'OL." (Deuteronomy 32:22). The Talmud teaches that
unconsciousness and insensitivity provide no relieve in hell. "The worms
of the grave are as hard to the dead person as a needle in living flesh" (Shabbos 13b). But the Torah also explicitly states that
"When the wicked person turns from all his sins that he did and guards all
My laws and practices justice and charity, he will surely live. All his sins
that he did will not be remembered against him; through the righteousness that
he practiced he will live" (Ezekiel 18:21-22).
The psychological power
wielded by priests and cult-leaders over their hypnotized flocks lies in their
implicit claim that it is they themselves who determine who will suffer in hell
and for what crimes (i.e. betrayal of the cult). However, the Torah teaches
that G-d alone determines what each one must suffer, and that a person suffers
only for those actions for which he bears responsibility, and not for the
crimes of others. ("It is the soul that sins that will die. A son will not
bear the sin of a father and a father will not bear the sin of the son. The
righteousness of the righteousness will be upon him and the wickedness of the
wicked will be upon him" -- Ezekiel 18:20).
The Torah view is that
while hell is certainly painful, it is compassionate in the sense that the
sinner pays for his sins in order to be cleansed of them and thus prepared for
reconciliation and true communion with G-d. Thus the Torah teaches that there
is a time-limit to hell, while the final reward is eternal.
Rabbi Nachman of Breslov
commented that while we believe in the eternal reward (Gan
Eden), and while it MAY BE that Olam Ha-Zeh, "This world", exists somewhere or other, the
place we are in now would for many people appear to be Gehennom,
in view of the terrible suffering many people go through here. May all that we
may have suffered here be our atonement, and may G-d speedily grant relief from
all our troubles and sorrows.
The Talmudic rabbi Rabbah
bar bar Hannah relates (Bava
Basra 74a) that he was taken by "an itinerant merchant" to a place in
the wilderness where Korach and his band were swallowed up. There was a fissure
in the crust of the earth from which smoke was rising, and the heat was so
intense that some drenched cotton-wool lowered into it on the end of a spear
was scorched immediately. The merchant asked him what he could hear. He heard
voices crying out: "Moses and his Torah are true, while Korach and his
band are deceivers." The merchant told Rabbah that Korach and his band
were rotating in the fire of hell like meat on a spit, and that every thirty
days they would complete a circuit and could be heard saying the same thing:
"Moses and his Torah are true.". This fits in well with another
teaching of Rabbi Nachman: that the essential pain of hell is not so much
physical as the pain and shame at having been wrong all along. If we have been
wrong, let's admit it!
* * *
THE
TORAH ECONOMY
The account of Korach's
challenge to Moses and Aaron is followed by the laws relating to the
sacrificial parts and Terumah (gifts of grain, oil, wine and other produce)
given to the priests in return for their service in the Sanctuary, and the
tithes which the Levites received in return for theirs.
In
In the words of Rambam (Laws of Shemittah and
Jubilee 13:12-13):
"The tribe of Levy
did not have a share in the
"And not only the
tribe of Levy, but every single person from all the inhabitants of the world
whose spirit encourages him and whose understanding leads him to separate
himself to stand before G-d and serve Him, to know G-d and go on the straight
path. G-d will remove from his neck the yoke of the "many
calculations" that people seek for themselves. For this person has
sanctified himself as a holy of holies, and HaShem will be his portion for ever
and ever and G-d will provide him in this world with what suffices him, just as
G-d provided the priests and the Levites with their livelihood. And thus King
David said: HaShem is the portion of my share and my cup: You sustain my
lot!"
Shabbat Shalom!!!
Avraham Yehoshua Greenbaum
